#Mdt transit verification

The inspection and verification of all installation and interconnection work and.Installation and interconnection of propulsion control equipments, propulsion cooling equipment, brake equipment, energy sources for auxiliaries and controls, heating and air conditioning, communications equipment, motors, wheels and axles, suspensions and frames.'In the case of the manufacture of a new rail car, final assembly would typically include, as a minimum, the following operations: ДЇTA's minimum requirements for final assembly are outlined at Appendix D to 49 CFR 661.11. The final assembly of each railcar must take place in the United States. At least 60% of the components of each railcar must be manufactured in the United States. The following chart identifies where AnsaldoBreda will perform various production activities:ДЇor railcars and all 'rolling stock,' FTA's Buy America requirements are twofold: In particular, MDT has asked whether AnsaldoBreda's approach meets the requirement that in-plant testing ofthe stationary product take place in the United States. The chart on the following page identifies the location where AnsaldoBreda intends to perform various production related activities, including design, manufacturing, testing, and final assembly.Д«ecause AnsaldoBreda plans to perform certain design and engineering activities in Italy, MDT asked FTA to determine whether its approach to producing the subject rail vehicles conforms to the minimum final assembly requirements outlined at Appendix D to 49 C.F. It proposed to split production and final assembly activities between its plants in Italy (Reggio Calabria, Pistoia, and Naples) and the United States (Pittsburg, California and Miami, Florida). During the pre-award audit conducted by MDT in accordance with FT A regulations, AnsaldoBreda outlined its plans for producing and assembling the HRVs. Doleman's letter, MDT intends to award a $313,832,000 contract to AlsaldoBreda for the production of 136 new HRV s. Libhaber assured me that, aside from the delay resulting from CAF's appeal, the facts underlying your Februrequest for a letter of interpretation remain unchanged.ДЄccording to Mr. I understand from MDT attorney Bruce Libhaber that MDT has completed this process and intends to award a contract to AnsaldoBreda. The result of the appeal was in CAF's favor and required MDT to reevaluate Best and Final Offers using only evaluation factors that were disclosed to the offerors. FTA decided CAF's appeal by letter dated November 23, 2011. BackgroundД«efore discussing the substance of MDT's request, I note that FTA's decision has been delayed by a bid protest, and subsequent appeal, filed by CAF USA, Inc. (AnsaldoBreda) for producing Heavy Rail Vehicles (HRV) for Miami-Dade Transit (MDT) would comply with FT A's Buy America rules for final assembly. I write in response to Michael Doleman's letter dated February 25, 2011, in which he asked the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to determine whether the process proposed by AnsaldoBreda S.P.A. Miami, Florida 33136 Subject: Buy America Determination of Compliance

Mdt transit